Exploring the Program Manager Career Path at Google: Insights from a Google TPM

Embarking on a career as a Google Technical Program Manager (TPM) is akin to stepping onto a fast-paced, exhilarating roller coaster. My journey within Google, specifically with Google Cloud Platform (GCP) and the Google Security team, has been nothing short of transformative. It’s been a deep dive into technology, teamwork, and personal growth, exceeding all initial expectations. This article provides an insider’s perspective into the realities of a Program Manager career path at Google, detailing the challenges, triumphs, and crucial lessons gleaned along the way.

From my very first day at Google, I was immersed in an environment brimming with exceptional individuals and cutting-edge technology. The pace was rapid, the learning curve steep, but the opportunity was immense. This exploration will offer a behind-the-scenes look at the multifaceted role of a Google TPM – the rewarding aspects, the demanding parts, and everything in between – providing valuable insights for those considering a program management career path at Google.

(Jump to sections within this article)

Navigating the Google Technical Program Manager Interview Process

My journey towards becoming a Google TPM began with a referral from a Google employee. Within many organizations, employee referrals significantly enhance your application’s visibility to recruiters. At Google, this advantage is even more pronounced, as the referral becomes an integrated part of your application journey.

Following the referral, a Google recruiter contacted me, and we scheduled an initial phone interview. This interview was designed to broadly assess my suitability across various TPM competencies. While the questions below aren’t verbatim, they represent the types of inquiries you can expect:

  • Program Sense: Describe a project you are particularly proud of and your role in its success.
  • Technical Depth: Elaborate on the system design of that project, detailing the technical challenges and solutions.
  • Analytical Skills: Recount a situation where you identified a product weakness and how you collaborated with your team to rectify it.
  • Leadership and Collaboration: Share an instance where you provided significant assistance to a teammate or fostered team collaboration.

Success in the phone interview led to an invitation to Google’s campus for the on-site interview phase. My preparation for this crucial stage centered on three key pillars:

  • Project Management Mastery: A solid grasp of project management fundamentals is indispensable. Having structured checklists in mind is crucial for delivering coherent and comprehensive answers. Reviewing materials for Project Management Professional (PMP) certification and Agile methodologies proved invaluable. My aim wasn’t certification, but to refresh my knowledge and quickly access relevant frameworks during interviews.
  • Technical Prowess: Be ready to delve into the technical intricacies of your past projects. Deeply understand the system designs, architectures, and technologies involved. Familiarizing yourself with system design principles through courses or materials is highly recommended. While coding isn’t assessed, the ability to discuss technical concepts is essential.
  • Project Story Bank: Google TPM interviews heavily rely on behavioral questions rooted in past experiences, often starting with “Tell me about a time when…”. Preparing a repertoire of 10+ project-based stories beforehand is far more effective than trying to recall them on the spot.

My on-site interviews took place at the Kirkland campus, with a mix of in-person and video conference interviewers—a standard Google interview format. Three key aspects of these interviews stood out:

  • Behavioral Question Intensity: The sheer volume of behavioral questions, especially those probing past projects, was notable. Despite extensive preparation, I found myself nearing the limit of my prepared stories by the final interviews. My advice is to prepare well over ten project stories to ensure you have ample material.
  • Supportive Interview Environment: All interviewers maintained a polite and conversational tone, making the experience feel more like a discussion than an interrogation. Their probing questions seemed designed to help me refine my answers rather than to find fault. Post-hire, I had the pleasure of collaborating with many of my interviewers, forging valuable professional relationships.
  • Unexpected Campus Tour: Following my last interview, the interviewer spontaneously offered me a campus tour. It was an exceptional, insightful experience, far surpassing the “official” Google campus tour I later undertook as an employee.

For a more detailed preparation guide, refer to my article: How to Prepare for Technical Program Manager (TPM) Interviews.

Post-interviews, I entered Google’s team matching phase—a unique process. My recruiter compiled a package of my application materials and interview feedback, making it accessible to hiring managers across Google. Interested managers could then schedule calls with me. A mutual agreement with a hiring manager would lead to a letter of support, which was added to my package and forwarded to the Hiring Committee for final decision.

Fortunately, a hiring manager from Google Cloud Platform expressed interest. Our discussions revealed a compelling team, and the recruiter included his support letter in my application packet, submitting it to the Hiring Committee.

Weeks later, I received the offer call—a truly surreal and exhilarating moment. The excitement and relief were palpable. The culmination of hard work, late nights, and stress had materialized into this pivotal career moment. Landing the Google role marked the beginning of an exciting new chapter, rich with opportunities for growth and new challenges.

Google Campus in Seattle-Kirkland: A Hub of Innovation and Collaboration

Google’s presence in the Pacific Northwest is substantial, comprising multiple campuses in Seattle and Kirkland. With thousands of employees, Google stands as a major employer in the region. Reports indicate nearly 3,000 employees in Kirkland alone by 2021 and another 3,000 in Seattle by 2018. Collectively, the Seattle-Kirkland campus is recognized as Google’s third-largest globally in terms of employee count.

The Seattle-Kirkland campuses function almost as a single entity, allowing employees to choose their preferred location on either side of Lake Washington. Seattle downtown residents often opt for the Seattle campus, while Eastside residents tend towards Kirkland. Commuting across the lake is also common. My primary location was Kirkland, but collaborations with Seattle-based teams meant regular visits to both campuses.

The original Kirkland campus in Houghton features four buildings and boasts typical Google amenities:

  • Multiple restaurants (3)
  • Barista-staffed coffee bars (2)
  • Comprehensive gym facilities
  • Massage therapy rooms
  • Nap pods for rest
  • Soccer field
  • Playground
  • Arcade room
  • Indoor basketball court
  • Indoor ping pong tables
  • Music room

This extensive list exemplifies Google’s commitment to employee well-being and work-life balance.

The Houghton campus is currently undergoing expansion, incorporating nearby buildings and promising enhanced facilities. These new spaces will feature large murals, fine art prints, video installations in zen rooms, and aerial sculptures. Additionally, the Kirkland Urban campus, near downtown Kirkland, adds four buildings totaling 760,000 square feet, including micro-kitchens, dining areas, lounges, meeting rooms, a recording studio, band practice space, a dog lounge with rooftop exercise, a small cinema, and a production studio.

Seattle’s campus initially centered in Fremont but expanded to South Lake Union, adding high-rise buildings with stunning lake views. These locations offer amenities like cafes, conference and collaboration spaces, UX labs, event auditoriums, fitness centers, medical clinics, bicycle lounges, and micro-kitchens.

The significant scale of the Seattle-Kirkland campus means a wide array of Google product teams are based here. This offers diverse project and team opportunities, second only to the larger California campuses (Mountain View and Sunnyvale). For career growth and variety, Seattle-Kirkland presents substantial advantages.

Team Structure: Navigating Program Management Roles at Google

Google Cloud Platform (GCP) is composed of diverse product areas like Compute, Networking, Storage, Databases, and Machine Learning, each managed by distinct teams. While Software Engineers and Product Managers within these product teams follow product-specific hierarchies, Technical Program Managers (TPMs) operate within a separate, GCP-wide TPM organization. TPMs report to the VP of Technical Program Management in Google Cloud, distinct from product VPs.

Within the TPM organization, sub-teams are aligned with product areas, each reporting to a Director of TPM (who then reports to the VP of TPM). Titles are fluid, but conceptually, there are Directors of TPM for Compute, Networking, and so on. These Directors oversee TPM Managers, who in turn manage individual TPMs. Crucially, TPM Managers are people managers, focusing on team management and Objectives and Key Results (OKR) reporting rather than feature-specific project driving.

Project teams typically include:

  • Product Manager (PM): Defines the product roadmap and vision.
  • Technical Program Manager (TPM): Drives project execution and planning.
  • Backend Software Engineers: Often from multiple teams, reporting to various Engineering Managers, even within the same product.
  • Frontend Software Engineers: Usually in dedicated teams, such as a UI team for Networking.

TPMs are not always assigned to every project. Smaller projects, particularly those within a single team, might not require TPM oversight. However, large-scale GCP projects involving multiple engineering teams almost always include TPMs.

Similarly, some infrastructure-focused, non-user-facing projects might operate without Product Managers. In such cases, the TPM might take on basic PM responsibilities, such as drafting Product Requirements Documents (PRDs). Projects lacking a user interface might also not involve frontend software engineers.

What Does a Google Technical Program Manager Do? Core Responsibilities

The Google Technical Program Manager role centers on owning and driving the execution of product development. Key responsibilities include:

  1. Project Plan Development:

    • Gather product requirements from the Product Manager.
    • Collaborate with Technical Leads (TLs) and Architects to decompose releases into actionable tasks.
    • Define task ownership, timelines, and resource allocation.
    • Actively track timelines and provide updates as necessary.
  2. Stakeholder Communication and Management:

    • Identify and engage all relevant project stakeholders.
    • Ensure consistent communication of project status via reports, meetings, and project websites.
    • Define and monitor project OKRs (Objectives and Key Results) for six-month cycles, reporting progress weekly to leadership.
  3. Risk Management:

    • Collaborate with engineering teams to identify and assess project risks based on impact and likelihood.
    • Develop and assign risk mitigation plans and owners.
    • Communicate risk status and impact to stakeholders if risks materialize.
  4. Dependency Tracking and Management:

    • Manage interdependencies across multiple teams with varying priorities and deadlines, common in TPM-led projects.
    • Ensure commitment from all dependent teams to deliver required components.
    • Monitor progress and proactively address priority shifts or resource changes in dependent teams (e.g., team member departures, priority realignments).
  5. Technical Design Leadership:

    • Collaborate with key Software Engineers to finalize and document product technical design.
    • Ensure design incorporates scalability, accessibility, testability, and other critical aspects.
    • Work with teams to define and validate Service Level Objectives (SLOs) and Service Level Indicators (SLIs) align with Product Manager expectations.
    • Secure sign-off on all inter-team interfaces from involved teams.
  6. Launch Process Management:

    • Schedule and manage bug bashes to ensure product quality.
    • Obtain launch sign-offs from all relevant teams (engineering, support, marketing, etc.).
    • Secure final launch approvals from VPs or Directors before product release.

For a deeper understanding of the TPM role, see my article: What Does A Technical Program Manager (TPM) Do? A Practical Guide.

Memorable Moments: Key Experiences Shaping My Google Career Path

Embracing the Noogler Experience: Google Onboarding

My initiation into Google as a Technical Program Manager was marked by an exceptional two-week New Hire Orientation—a stark contrast to onboarding experiences elsewhere. Google prioritizes employee learning from the outset; managers were instructed to refrain from assigning tasks during this period. Instead, we were encouraged to fully immerse ourselves in Google’s culture, products, and technologies. This clearly signaled Google’s investment in its employees, prioritizing learning and growth from day one.

As a “Noogler” (new Google employee), I was in a “protected” learning phase for six months. The emphasis was on knowledge acquisition, network building, and understanding the Google ethos. My TPM Director, in an early one-on-one, underscored the unparalleled learning opportunity Google offered. My manager echoed this sentiment, assuring me that learning took precedence over immediate performance metrics.

This philosophy was liberating, fostering growth without typical new-hire pressures. It allowed exploration, questioning, and even mistakes, without fear of instant repercussions. My schedule filled with training, tech talks, and social events—all designed to instill Google’s innovative and collaborative practices. The Noogler period established a foundation for my Google tenure, emphasizing intellectual curiosity and long-term development over short-term gains, crucial for a successful program manager career path at Google.

Adapting to Google’s Rhythms: Project Timelines

Early in my Google TPM role, I encountered a cultural adjustment regarding project timelines. Coming from Microsoft’s date-specific deliverable schedules, Google’s approach felt temporally different. Coordinating with multiple GCP engineering teams, ETA requests consistently yielded “end of quarter” responses. This transformed my project plans into quarter-based schedules, lacking flexibility within quarters.

This quarterly cadence contrasted sharply with Microsoft’s concrete dates and iterative timeline adjustments. At Google, deadline fluidity was common, requiring adjustment. TPMs bore significant ownership of these timelines. While we created the plans, we also became accountable for every date. Engineering team timeline shifts were straightforward for them, but for me, they necessitated detailed justifications.

Embracing the Google TPM role meant accepting timeline guardianship. This involved a nuanced power dynamic: engineering teams could readily adjust schedules, yet I had to rigorously justify each change to stakeholders. This required a blend of assertiveness and adaptability. I learned to confidently articulate rationale for timeline shifts, ensuring stakeholder alignment with evolving plans—a key skill in navigating a program manager career path at Google.

Balancing Agility and Accountability in Project Management

A major GCP project involved launching a new service, placing me centrally in project management as the TPM. Creating a detailed project plan posed a challenge; some team members resisted committing to specific deadlines, favoring an Agile approach with fluid ETAs adjusted based on progress. This perspective stemmed from software development realities—emerging tasks and evolving ETAs. While I understood the Agile perspective, it clashed with the need for predictable timelines for leadership and the Product Manager.

Fortunately, the Technical Lead supported structured milestones and committed ETAs. As a compromise, we assigned a project segment to the Agile-leaning developer, allowing self-management with minimal intervention. It was a calculated risk, intended to contrast the value of structured planning.

However, this segment became opaque, with unclear progress and murky deadlines—reinforcing the need for accountability alongside agility. We intervened, halting the hands-off approach and recalculating a realistic ETA to avoid jeopardizing the project timeline. From then on, this segment followed the structured approach of the rest of the project. Despite initial hurdles, we launched on time, highlighting the critical balance between Agile flexibility and structured project direction, essential for program management success.

Mentorship and Continuous Learning at Google

Joining Google, I was immediately impressed and slightly intimidated by the caliber of my colleagues. Imposter syndrome was a palpable feeling. Google proactively addresses this during New Hire Orientation, openly discussing and normalizing these feelings. This transparency was reassuring, a welcome contrast to the unspoken anxieties in the tech industry.

Support extended beyond discussion. Google provided extensive training programs to address imposter syndrome, offering coping strategies and tools. These resources were invaluable as I navigated areas where my expertise seemed less developed compared to my seasoned peers. The training emphasized continuous learning and growth, reminding us that everyone starts somewhere, even accomplished Googlers. This culture of learning and encouragement helped me build confidence in my role.

Beyond formal training, Google’s mentorship programs were crucial. Experienced Googlers volunteer as career coaches and Noogler guides. Mentorship pairing was simple, connecting me with individuals who had navigated similar journeys. Within my team, a senior TPM mentored me, providing guidance as I learned the specifics of the role. This layered mentorship—formal and informal—ensured support was readily available, reinforcing Google’s team-oriented growth culture, vital for career progression in program management.

Google Perks: Enhancing the Work Experience Beyond the Job Description

Starting each day at Google was a pleasure. Free, restaurant-quality breakfasts provided a relaxed and social start, fueling up for the day ahead. Lunches were equally impressive, with diverse Google restaurants offering complimentary meals—more than just sustenance, it was a chance to connect with colleagues from different teams.

Perks extended beyond meals. Afternoon coffee breaks featured barista-prepared coffee, a cafe-quality treat. The on-site gym simplified fitting exercise into a busy day. Late workdays were accommodated with free dinners. Even product feedback was rewarded with perks like free massages.

Google’s perks simplified and enhanced daily work life. Micro-kitchens offered snacks anytime, arcade rooms provided breaks, and nap pods offered rest. Google’s care for employees was evident, providing for needs and beyond. This was a significant contrast to previous workplaces where such perks were aspirational at best.

Furthermore, learning opportunities were vast, covering topics far beyond typical work training. Business strategy, personal finance, and advanced coding classes were available, often led by fellow Googlers sharing expertise or external specialists bringing fresh perspectives. This educational mix enriched professional and personal growth within the Google ecosystem, a key benefit for long-term program manager career path development.

Conflict Resolution and Leadership Insights from My Director

While Google fosters a respectful and “Googley” culture, workplace conflicts can arise. I experienced a significant disagreement with a coworker regarding project ownership and recognition. I felt he was attempting to delegate projects to me while seeking credit for my efforts with our Director. I sought to define my role independently and receive due credit for my accomplishments. I raised this conflict with my Director.

The Director addressed the situation by speaking with each of us individually, understanding our perspectives. He then provided each of us a copy of “Leadership and Self-Deception” by the Arbinger Institute, accompanied by a handwritten note highlighting its value in navigating workplace relationships.

Reading the book, I realized how easily one can become “boxed in,” blaming others for collaborative issues. This “in-the-box” mentality leads to self-betrayal by resisting helping others. “Getting outside the box” requires self-reflection and seeing others as individuals with their own needs, hopes, and concerns. This shift allows for appreciation and effective collaboration.

Reflecting on my coworker conflict, I recognized we were both in the same team, aiming for collective success, but with differing approaches. Adopting a new perspective, I discussed the issue with my coworker, and we found a mutually agreeable solution. This experience fostered personal and professional growth for both of us.

Since then, I actively strive for self-awareness in conflicts, acknowledging that my perspective isn’t always correct. I approach disagreements with an open mind, seeking to understand others’ viewpoints. This has strengthened my professional relationships and fostered more reliable connections—a crucial aspect of career growth and effective program management.

Securing GCP: A Cross-Functional Collaboration

Within Google’s Security team, my role focused on a critical mission: enhancing the security of Google Cloud Platform (GCP) products. This involved extensive engagement across GCP services. I collaborated with TPMs from various GCP product areas, understanding their infrastructures and guiding them in integrating with our security frameworks. This was a comprehensive learning experience, providing deep insights into each product’s architecture, release cycles, and unique security challenges. It was as much about relationship building as it was about security enhancement, significantly expanding my technical expertise, vital for a program manager career path at Google.

However, platform security improvements faced challenges. Product teams had varied priorities and resource constraints. While some teams readily embraced security integration, others faced tight deadlines and limited capacity. Navigating these varying responses required a delicate balance between security urgency and product development pressures. Yet, “Googleyness”—shared commitment to company values—prevailed. We found common ground and innovative solutions, even amid challenges.

This experience was a masterclass in cross-group collaboration and conflict management. Each interaction honed negotiation skills, active listening, and the pursuit of win-win outcomes—hallmarks of effective teamwork. The project was transformative, fostering both technical acumen and the ability to unite diverse teams towards a critical, shared objective. It significantly contributed to my professional growth and solidified my understanding of effective program management in a complex environment.

Compensation for a Google Technical Program Manager: Salary and Reviews

Salary Benchmarks

Levels.fyi is a leading public database for compensation data in tech companies, utilizing job offer data to provide salary transparency across levels in various tech organizations.

Below is a snapshot of Levels.fyi data for Google Technical Program Manager salaries as of November 3, 2023.

Performance Review and Promotion Process

Google employs a semi-annual performance review cycle. Managers provide written assessments of employee accomplishments over the preceding six months and propose a performance rating. These recommendations are then discussed among TPM Managers within the organization. Discrepancies are addressed through collaborative discussions and reviews.

Performance ratings and their corresponding reward multipliers (for bonuses and stock) are as follows:

  • TI (Transformational Impact): 1.6x multiplier
  • OI (Outstanding Impact): 1.45x multiplier
  • SI (Significant Impact): 1.25x multiplier
  • MI (Moderate Impact): 0.9x multiplier
  • NI (No Impact): 0x multiplier

Promotions also occur semi-annually. Google Technical Program Managers seeking promotion must formally apply, compiling a packet detailing their achievements since their last promotion. This packet is submitted to a Promotions Committee, which ranks applicants and establishes a promotion cut-off line. Candidates above the line are promoted, while others receive feedback on their application and areas for improvement, crucial information for career path planning and advancement.

The Google Culture: Fostering Innovation and Growth in Program Management

Embracing Openness and Innovation

Entering Google, I was immediately struck by a pervasive culture of openness and innovation. Ideas were not just welcomed but actively encouraged, regardless of their source. This fostered a vibrant atmosphere where creativity thrived and innovation became an everyday practice.

It was empowering to know my voice mattered and that I could contribute meaningfully. Access to Google’s source code for all products and default calendar visibility for all employees exemplified this openness. Weekly TGIF (Thank Good It’s Friday, though held on Thursdays) sessions, open Q&A with the leadership team, further reinforced transparent communication and accessibility.

This culture of openness spurred constant boundary-pushing and exploration. It challenged me to think creatively and contribute my best ideas. While this sometimes meant encountering failures, it also ensured continuous learning and growth—incredibly rewarding for a program manager career path focused on problem-solving and innovation.

The Power of Collaboration and Teamwork

Teamwork emphasis at Google was unparalleled. Projects were collaborative efforts, with each member playing a vital role in shared goals. This unity and shared purpose drove us to overcome challenges and achieve significant outcomes together. The camaraderie fostered within teams transformed work into a shared mission, enhancing motivation and job satisfaction, particularly important in program management roles requiring extensive collaboration.

This collaborative spirit extended company-wide, fostering a strong sense of community. Cross-functional teams regularly collaborated, sharing insights and learning from each other. This interconnectedness made work more enjoyable and yielded better results by leveraging diverse skills and perspectives across the organization—a key advantage for navigating complex program management challenges.

Work-Life Balance and a Culture of Play

Google uniquely balanced hard work with a sense of play. Office spaces were designed to stimulate creativity and collaboration, featuring vibrant decor and open layouts. The culture encouraged breaks, games, and fun, creating a positive and energizing atmosphere that made demanding work more manageable.

While the work was challenging and demanding, the playful culture alleviated stress and provided necessary relaxation and rejuvenation. This balance made Google a uniquely enjoyable and productive workplace, where professional success and personal well-being were both prioritized—a significant factor in long-term career satisfaction in program management.

Focus on Employee Well-Being

Working as a Google TPM involved pressures and high expectations. The fast pace and high stakes created a challenging yet stimulating environment. Workloads could be intense, but a supportive culture and shared purpose kept me grounded and focused. It was a constant reminder of collective effort toward larger goals.

Despite pressures, Google emphasized well-being and self-care. Resources and support were available for stress management and work-life balance, including well-being education classes. This holistic approach to employee well-being demonstrated Google’s commitment to supporting employees both professionally and personally, crucial for sustained performance and career longevity in demanding roles like program management.

A Culture of Support and Growth

Reflecting on my Google tenure, culture significantly shaped my experience and growth as a TPM. It celebrated diversity, encouraged innovation, and fostered community. I felt supported, challenged, and inspired to excel.

More than just a workplace, Google was a community of driven individuals pursuing excellence. The culture of support and growth permeated every interaction, project, and challenge. This unique environment made my Google experience exceptional, leaving a lasting impact on my professional journey and highlighting the importance of a supportive culture in a program manager career path.

Downsides of Working At Google: Balancing Realities with Rewards

Slow Career Progression

A notable challenge at Google was the pace of career progression. Promotions and advancements seemed slower than anticipated, which could be demotivating. Despite hard work and achievements, the path to the next level often felt protracted and somewhat ambiguous. This required patience, persistence, and a focus on long-term growth rather than immediate advancement, a key consideration for those planning their program manager career path at Google.

Promotion structures and criteria weren’t always transparent, adding complexity to career advancement. Navigating this required proactive mentorship seeking, continuous feedback solicitation, and advocating for personal career development. While this slow pace fostered resilience, it was a challenging aspect of the Google experience, particularly for those with strong career advancement ambitions.

Navigating Organizational Complexity

Google’s sheer size and organizational complexity can be overwhelming, especially for newcomers. Understanding inter-team and inter-departmental interactions and resource navigation takes time. This complexity sometimes led to inefficiencies and a feeling of being a small component within a vast machine.

Decentralization meant practices and processes varied significantly across teams. While this allowed flexibility and autonomy, it also created inconsistencies and a lack of standardization, adding navigational challenges. Effective program management within Google requires mastering this organizational complexity and building strong networks to navigate effectively.

Limited Visibility and Impact

Given Google’s scale and employee count, individual work can sometimes feel less visible and impactful. Contributing to large, multi-stakeholder projects can dilute individual contributions, making it challenging to see direct impact.

This lack of visibility can be demotivating, especially for those who thrive on tangible results. Connecting individual work to the larger organizational mission and actively seeking visibility and impact opportunities became crucial for job satisfaction and motivation. For program managers, this means proactively showcasing project successes and their contributions to broader organizational goals to ensure career visibility and progression.

Conclusion: Reflecting on the Google Technical Program Manager Career Path

Looking back on my time as a Google Technical Program Manager, it’s clear this journey has been one of immense growth, learning, and unforgettable experiences. The vibrant culture, the brilliant colleagues, and the innovative projects have profoundly shaped my professional trajectory.

Google, with its unique blend of innovation, collaboration, and a fun-oriented approach, provided an unparalleled work environment. It pushed my boundaries, challenged me to think expansively, and exemplified the true meaning of teamwork. The skills and lessons acquired extend far beyond technical expertise, encompassing resilience, adaptability, and thriving in dynamic environments—all crucial for a successful program manager career path.

Moving forward, I carry not only technical skills but also invaluable soft skills, prepared to navigate fast-paced, ever-changing professional landscapes. My Google tenure has been a remarkable chapter of personal and professional growth, providing a strong foundation for future endeavors in program management and beyond.

About Me

I am an engineer with over 15 years of experience in the tech industry, including roles at Google, Amazon, and Microsoft. My roles have spanned Software Engineering, Product Management, and Technical Program Management. I also hold an MBA from Kellogg School of Management with specializations in Finance and Marketing.

My driving passion is empowering engineers to achieve Financial Independence and Retire Early (FIRE). Having reached FIRE at 40, I offer guidance on personal finance strategies and career insights. If you have questions or need advice, please feel free to reach out!

My Newsletter

Get My FREE ebook “Product Sense Unlocked: 150 Answers For Product Sense Interview Questions”

Subscribe to receive my PM interview guide and learn how to differentiate your answers to Product Sense interview questions!

Share

Tweet

Share

Pin1

1 Shares

Comments

No comments yet. Why don’t you start the discussion?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *